高级检索

Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions ›› 2018, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (5): 436–446.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2018.00436

• • 上一篇    

  

  • 收稿日期:2018-03-15 接受日期:2018-08-28 出版日期:2018-11-19 发布日期:2018-11-21
  • 基金资助:
    This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41571516), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19040500, XDA19070502, XDA2010010402), and Gansu Province Social Science Planning Project (YB063).

Sociodemographic characteristics, cultural biases, and environmental attitudes: An empirical application of grid-group cultural theory in Northwestern China

FangLei Zhong1,2,*(),AiJun Guo2,XiaoJuan Yin3,JinFeng Cui2,Xiao Yang2,YanQiong Zhang4   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
    2 School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
    3 Institute For Public Policy, Gansu Academy of Social Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
    4 School of Foreign Languages, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2018-03-15 Accepted:2018-08-28 Online:2018-11-19 Published:2018-11-21
  • Contact: FangLei Zhong E-mail:flzhong@lzb.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41571516), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19040500, XDA19070502, XDA2010010402), and Gansu Province Social Science Planning Project (YB063).

RichHTML

17

PDF (PC)

433

Abstract:

Natural resource-management studies have become increasingly attentive to the influences of human factors. Among these, cultural biases shape people's responses to changes in natural resource systems. Several studies have applied grid-group cultural theory to assess the effects of multiple value biases among stakeholders on natural resource management. We developed and administered a questionnaire in the Heihe River Basin (n = 364) in northwestern China to investigate the appropriateness of applying this theory in the Chinese context of natural resource management. The results revealed various cultural biases among the respondents. In descending order of prevalence, these biases were hierarchism (46.98%), individualism (26.65%), egalitarianism (18.96%), and fatalism (2.78%), with the remaining respondents (4.67%) evidencing no obvious bias. Our empirical study revealed respondents' worldviews and the influence of sociodemographic characteristics on cultural biases, as theoretically posited. Among the variables examined, age had a positive and significant effect across all biases except individualism. The correlation of income to all cultural biases was consistently negative. Only education had a negative and significant effect across all biases. Women were found to adhere to egalitarianism, whereas men adhered to individualism and hierarchism. Thus, grid-group cultural theory was found to be appropriate in the Chinese context, with gender, age, education, and income evidently accounting for cultural biases. Relationships between environmental attitudes and cultural biases conformed with the hypothesis advanced by grid-group cultural theory. This finding may be of value in explaining individuals' environmental attitudes and facilitating the development and implementation of natural resource-management policies.

Key words: sociodemographic characteristics, environmental attitudes, cultural biases, grid-group cultural theory, rural residents, Northwestern China

"

"

"

Cultural biases Characteristics Main opinions
Individualism Membership in a loose personal network. Prefers self-regulation, freedom of market rationality, minimization of authoritarian control. Support public participation and fair treatment. Wealth can be obtained through hard work.
Fatalism Strict, binding regulations but no strong relation to any group or to a strong personal network. A person's destiny is a matter of coincidence.
Egalitarianism Membership in groups without strong internal regulations; strong boundaries between groups, with no external contacts other than within group. Men are born equal, and inequality is a deficiency of society.
Hierarchism Membership in strongly hierarchically organized group. Strong group boundaries, with strong, binding internal regulations; little personal contact outside the group. One has to obey authority and the social order.

"

Hierarchist Individualist Egalitarian Fatalist
Average 3.86 3.64 3.61 2.59

"

Cultural bias Number Proportion
Hierarchist 171 46.98%
Individualist 97 26.65%
Egalitarian 69 18.96%
Fatalist 10 2.78%
No cultural bias 17 4.67%
Total 364 100%

"

"

"

"

Spearman test Hierarchism Individualism Egalitarianism Fatalism
Nature capricious Correlation coefficient 0.099 ?0.013 0.322** 0.671*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.196 0.896 0.007 0.034
Nature benign Correlation coefficient ?0.139 0.192 0.499** 0.518
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.069 0.059 0.000 0.125
Nature tolerant Correlation coefficient 0.199** 0.067 0.006 0.448
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.009 0.513 0.962 0.194
Nature ephemeral Correlation coefficient 0.178* 0.176 0.287* 0.718*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.02 0.085 0.017 0.019
1 Blais-McPherson M, Rudiak-Gould P Strengthening inter-disciplinary and inter-ideological collaboration on REDD: a cultural theory approach. Global Environmental Change 2017; 42: 13- 23.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.008
2 Cheng GD, Li X, Zhao WZ, et al. Integrated study of the water-ecosystem-economy in the Heihe River Basin. National Science Review 2014; 1: 3 413- 428.
doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwu017
3 Dake K Myths of nature: culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues 1992; 48: 4 21- 37.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x
4 Daniels SE, Walker GB, 2001. Working through Environmental Conflict: the Collaborative Learning Approach. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
5 De Moor R, 1995. Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
6 Douglas M, 1970. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology. London: Barie and Rockliff.
7 Douglas M, Wildavsky A, 1983. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8 Eckersley R Green politics and the new class: selfishness or virtue?. Political Studies 1989; 37: 2 205- 223.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb01479.x
9 Ellis RJ, Thompson F Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review 1997; 91: 4 885- 897.
doi: 10.2307/2952171
10 Ester P, De Moor R, Halman L, 1994. The individualizing society: value change in Europe and North America. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
11 Grendstad G Party followership and leadership in Norway: a political culture approach. Party Politics 1995; 1: 2 221- 243.
doi: 10.1177/1354068895001002003
12 Grendstad G Grid-Group theory and political orientations: effects of cultural biases in Norway in the 1990s. Scandinavian Political Studies 2000; 23: 3 217- 244.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00037
13 Grendstad G, Sundback S Socio-demographic effects on cultural biases: a nordic study of grid-group theory. Acta Sociologica 2003; 46: 4 289- 306.
doi: 10.1177/0001699303464002
14 Halik A, Verweij M Socio-cultural diversity and public preferences for coral reef management options in Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management 2018; 162: 13- 23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.08.012
15 Harding S, Phillips D, Fogarty M, 1986. Contrasting values in Western Europe: unity, diversity and change. London: Macmillan.
16 Hildyard N, Hegde P, Wolvekamp P, et al. Same platform, different train: the politics of participation. Unasylva 1998; 49: 194 26- 34.
17 Hoekstra AY Appreciation of water: four perspectives. Water Policy 1998; 1: 6 605- 622.
doi: 10.1016/S1366-7017(99)00013-6
18 Hoogstra MA, Schanz H The future orientation of foresters: an exploratory research among Dutch foresters into the prerequisite for strategic planning in forestry. Forest Policy and Economics 2008; 10: 4 220- 229.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.10.004
19 Hoogstra-Klein MA, Permadi DB, Yasmi Y The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management. Forest Policy and Economics 2012; 20: 99- 106.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.001
20 Jenkins-Smith HC, Smith WK, 1994. Ideology, culture, and risk perception. In: Coyle DJ, Ellis RJ (eds.). Politics, Policy and Culture. Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 17–32.
21 Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, et al. Culture and identity-protective cognition: explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2007; 4: 3 465- 505.
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x
22 Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, et al. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology 2009; 4: 2 87- 90.
doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.341
23 Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 2011; 14: 2 147-` 174.
doi: 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
24 Marris C, Langford IH, O'Riordan T A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis 1998; 18: 5 635- 647.
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00376.x
25 O'Riordan T, Jordan A Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Global Environmental Change 1999; 9: 2 81- 93.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00030-2
26 Oltedal S, Moen BE, Klempe H, et al., 2004. Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
27 Peters E, Slovic P The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996; 26: 16 1427- 1453.
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x
28 Price JC, Walker IA, Boschetti F Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014; 37: 8- 20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.10.001
29 Rayner S, Malone EL, 1998. Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
30 Rippl S Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research 2002; 5: 2 147- 165.
doi: 10.1080/13669870110042598
31 Schwarz M, Thompson M, 1990. Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. New York: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32 Sharp L, Macrorie R, Turner A Resource efficiency and the imagined public: insights from cultural theory. Global Environmental Change 2015; 34: 196- 206.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.001
33 Sjöberg L Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis 2000; 20: 1 1- 12.
doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00001
34 Slimak MW, Dietz T Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis 2006; 26: 6 1689- 1705.
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x
35 Smith TW Some aspects of measuring education. Social Science Research 1995; 24: 3 215- 242.
doi: 10.1006/ssre.1995.1008
36 Thompson M, Wildavsky A A poverty of distinction: from economic homogeneity to cultural heterogeneity in the classification of poor people. Policy Sciences 1986; 19: 2 163- 199.
doi: 10.1007/BF02113494
37 Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A, 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
38 Thompson M Cultural theory and integrated assessment. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 1997; 2: 3 139- 150.
doi: 10.1023/A:1019065412191
39 Van den Broeck A, Heunks F, 1994. Political culture. Patterns of political orientations and behaviour. In: Ester P, Halman L, De Moor R (eds.). The Individualizing Society. Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, pp. 67–96.
40 Van de Graaff S Understanding the nuclear controversy: an application of cultural theory. Energy Policy 2016; 97: 50- 59.
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.007
41 Verweij M, Douglas M, Ellis R, et al. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Administration 2006; 84: 4 817- 843.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1
42 Wildavsky A Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. The American Political Science Review 1987; 81: 1 3- 22.
doi: 10.2307/1960776
43 Wildavsky A, Dake K Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?. Daedalus 1990; 119: 4 41- 60.
44 Wilmsen C, 2005. Perils on the road to participatory research in community forestry. In: Ning ZH, Abdollahi KK (eds.). Urban and Community Forestry: Working together to Facilitate Change. Baton Rouge: Southern University, pp. 49–56.
45 Wondolleck JM, Manring NJ, Crowfoot JE Teetering at the top of the ladder: the experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociological Perspectives 1996; 39: 2 249- 262.
doi: 10.2307/1389311
46 Yaffee SL, Wondolleck JM, 1997. Building bridges across agency boundaries. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF, Thomas JW, et al. (eds.). Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: the Science of Ecosystem Management. Washington: Island Press, pp. 381–396.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 357 -368 .
[2] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 369 -378 .
[3] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 413 -420 .
[4] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 379 -391 .
[5] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 392 -403 .
[6] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 404 -412 .
[7] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 421 -427 .
[8] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(4): 279 -285 .
[9] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(5): 428 -435 .
[10] . [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2018, 10(4): 286 -292 .