Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions ›› 2021, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 357-365.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2021.21040.

Previous Articles    

Stabilizing subgrades of transport structures by injecting solidifying solutions in cold regions

P. O. Lomov(),A. L. Lanis,D. A. Razuvaev,M. G. Kavardakov   

  1. Siberian Transport University, DusiKoval'chuk St. , 191, Novosibirsk, 630049, Russia
  • Received:2021-05-20 Accepted:2021-08-17 Online:2021-10-31 Published:2021-12-03
  • Contact: P. O. Lomov E-mail:LomovPO@mail.ru

Abstract:

Transport structures built throughout the period from 1960 to 1980 in permafrost regions based on the principle of permafrost preservation are subject to deformations. In many cases, the reason is a gradual change in temperature and their subgrade condition within the active zone due to the structures' technogenic impact. Design solutions for the fifty-year-old structures fail to ensure in all cases their reliable operation at the present time. The greatest danger to the reliable operation of railway lines in cold regions is uneven deformations of bridges, which are barrier places. Therefore, the solution to this problem is urgent especially due to the necessity of increase carrying capacity. The purpose of this study is to increase reliability of bridge operation in cold regions through strengthening the subgrade by reinforcement with injection of solidifying solutions. The problem of uneven deformations due to permafrost degradation is considered using the example of a railway bridge located in the northern line of the Krasnoyarsk railway. Deformations of the bridge abutments began immediately after the construction was completed and the bridge was open for traffic-since 1977. Permafrost degradation was developing more actively straight under the abutments due to higher thermal conductivity of the piles concrete. Notably, thawing intensity of frozen soils under the bridge abutments is uneven due to its orientation to the cardinal points. The analysis of archive materials and results of the geodetic survey made it possible to systematize the features of augmenting deformations of each abutment over time. The engineering-geological survey with drilling wells near the abutments ensured determination of soil characteristics, both in the frozen and thawed states. Thermometric wells were arranged to measure temperatures. The analysis and systematization of the data obtained allowed us to develop geotechnical models for each abutment of the bridge. The peculiarity of these models is allowance for changes in the strength and deformation characteristics of the soil calculated layers depending on changes in temperature and the soil condition. Thus, different calculated geological elements with the corresponding strength and deformation characteristics were identified in the soil layers of the same origin. The analysis of the systematized geodetic data allowed us to confirm adequacy of the developed geotechnical models. Studies carried out using geotechnical models made it possible to predict improvement of physical and mechanical characteristics of the subgrade to prevent further growth deformations of the bridge abutments. The method of reinforcement by injection is proposed. Injecting a solution under pressure leads to strengthening of weakened thawed soils and improving their physical and mechanical properties. This research theoretically substantiates and develops the geotechnical models of the reinforced pier footing of bridge abutments by injection of solidifying solutions. The models take into account the reinforcement parameters and elements for the case in question. The influence of reinforcement on the change in physical and mechanical properties of the soil mass is determined.

Key words: reinforcement of soils, injection of solidifying solution, strengthening of pier footing soils, geotechnical model, bridge abutments, deformations, plastic frozen soil, permafrost degradation

Figure 1

General view of the bridge"

Figure 2

Longitudinal engineering-geological profile of soils of the bridge subgrade in 2020"

Figure 3

Graphs for measuring soil temperature by depth (the temperature was measured in October)"

Figure 4

Geotechnical model for calculating the additional subsidence value"

Table 1

Description of the elements of the geotechnical model"

No.ElementDescription of the geotechnical model elementsConditions for formation of the geotechnical model elements
1Element No. 1Fill soilThe soil environment is formed according to the findings of engineering and geological surveys. Soil behavior is accounted for according to the Mohr-Coulomb model.
2Element No. 2Fill subsoil
3Element No. 3Frozen soil at the bridge subgrade
4Element No. 4Soil mass strengthened by injecting with the solidifying solutionParameters of the strengthened soil mass are defined by the requirements on the strength and deformability of the structure subgrade. Behavior of the mass is taken into account according to the Mohr-Coulomb elastic-plastic model.
5Element No. 5Thawed layer of frozen soilDimensions of the thawed layer are defined by a simplified procedure using the Equation (3). Characteristics of the thawed layer are determined based on the findings of engineering and geological surveys. Behavior of the thawed layer is accounted for according to the Soft-soil elastic-plastic model.
6Bridge abutmentConfiguration of the bridge abutment and foundations is modeled for each particular case using the design documentation. Behavior of bridge structures is accounted for according to the Elastic model.
7"Concrete-soil" contact modelInteraction of the bridge structures and the soil environment is taken into account in view of the reduction of the bonding characteristics at the contact.
8Restraint of displacements model of the calculated regionDisplacements of soil environment points are restrained along the perimeter of the calculated region.

Figure 5

Design algorithm for strengthening the thawed subgrade by injecting solidifying solutions in cold regions"

Table 2

Main thermophysical and mechanical characteristics of soils and materials"

Element/layer nameρ (g/cm3)С (kPa)φЕ(MPa)Cth (kJ/(m3?°С))L(kJ)
Bridge abutment (reinforced concrete)2.40---2,1002,100-
Fill soil (1)1.912030°502,3002,100-
Thawed soil (2)1.82343°432,3102,140-
Thawed soil (3)1.881920°193,0202,180-
Thawed soil (4)1.98612°83,3502,350-
Frozen soil (5)1.93420*25°100*3,3502,35064,454
Thawing interlayer2.05523,3502,350-
Strengthened mass2.002528°252,4502,450-

Figure 6

Structure's digital model"

Figure 7

Deformed view of the structure model"

Isakov VA, 2015. Temperature regime at the subgrade of roads in permafrost. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography, 3: 25-34. (in Russian)
Shastunova U, Michailov P, 2017. Thermal interference of engineering construction with permafrost ground as bottom. MATEC Web of Conferences, pp. 106. .
Shroder JF, Haeberli W, Whiteman C, 2015. Snow and Ice-Related Hazards, Risks and Disasters. Boston: Academic Press, pp. 812. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394849-6.00001-9.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394849-6.00001-9
Tomilov SN, Sim AD, Grinev PE, 2020. The problem of bridge abutments subsidence in the conditions of degrading permafrost subgrade and the possibility to solve it. Russian Journal of Transport Engineering, 3(7): 2-2. DOI:10.15862/02SATS320. (in Russian)
doi: 10.15862/02SATS320. (in Russian
Lanis AL, 2016. Methods for strengthening subgrade by injecting. Izvestia Transsiba, 3(27): 117-124. (in Russian)
Adamovich AN, 1980. Soil Consolidation and Anti-filtration Curtain. Moscow: Energia, pp. 320. (in Russian)
Cambefort A, 1971. Soil injection. Principles and Methods. Moscow: Energia, pp. 336. (in Russian)
Khamov AP, 1997. On the use of clay cement groat injection to strengthen the foundations of buildings and structures. Subgrades, Foundations and Soil Mechanics, 3: 20-22. (in Russian)
Nicolini E, Nova R, 2000. Modelling of a tunnel excavation in a non-cohesive soil improved with cement mix injections. Computers and Geotechnics, 27(4): 249-272. .
Lanis AL, 2019. Reinforcement of exploited high fills by injection of solidifying solutions. MIIT, pp. 395. (in Russian)
Konishchev VN, 2009. Response of permafrost to climate warming. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography, 4: 10-20. (in Russian)
Lanis AL, Razuvaev DA, 2017. Systematization of features and requirements for geological survey of railroad subgrades functioning in cold regions. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 9(3): 205-212. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00205.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00205
Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute, USSR State Construction Committee, 1982. Guidelines for concreting foundations and communications in permafrost soils, in view of concrete solidifying at negative temperatures. Stroyizdat, pp. 160. (in Russian)
Lanis A, 2018a. Results of modeling the behavior of the subgrade with pressure injection of solidifying solutions. MATEC Web of Conferences, Siberian Transport Forum – TransSiberia. 239: 05006. .
Lanis AL, 2018b. Results of modeling operated fills during pressure injection of solidifying solutions. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin, 3(46): 43-50. (in Russian)
Kudryavtsev SA, Sakharov II, Paramonov VN, 2014. Freezing and thawing of soils, practical examples and finite element calculations. St. Petersburg: Georeconstructsia, pp. 248.
[1] ShanShan Chen,ShuYing Zang,Li Sun. Characteristics of permafrost degradation in Northeast China and its ecological effects: A review [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2020, 12(1): 1-11.
[2] Askar Zhussupbekov, Zhanbolat Shakhmov, Gulshat Tleulenova. Geotechnical problems on freezing ground soil and experimental investigation in Kazakhstan [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2017, 9(3): 331-334.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!